Loading...
Blog2017-05-23T19:05:56-07:00

Avada includes a blog shortcode you can use anywhere on the site!

This blog shortcode was submitted by Markus, one of our Avada users and now on our developing team! It just goes to show what an awesome community we have, everyone is willing to help & share ideas. Dont wait, be a part of the Avada community today!

A penalty tax inequity in the Reid bill

By |Saturday, 21 November 2009|Categories: Uncategorized|Tags: , , |

Under Leader Reid’s amendment, in the year 2019 about 16 million U.S. citizens would be uninsured and be forced to pay a penalty tax of almost $800 per year. About eight million illegal aliens would be uninsured and would owe no penalty tax. Both groups would get their health care through a combination of out-of-pocket spending and use of uncompensated care in emergency rooms and free health clinics. This seems unfair. Details follow for those who care. Warning: the details get weedy quickly. You might want to skip them. I am including them mostly for experts and reporters who may want to follow up on this. If you are a policy amateur but have been reading this blog for more than a week or two, feel free to dive in. You can handle the complexity. If you want to know my guess about why the Reid amendment has this problem, please skip to the last section of this post. Background Both the House and Senate bills require applicable individuals to buy health insurance. If you are an applicable individual and you do not have insurance, you pay a penalty tax to the IRS. The taxes are different: House bill: roughly 2.5% of adjusted gross income; Senate bill: $750 per person in 2016, with smaller phase-in amounts in 2014 and 2015. Each bill defines exceptions to the term applicable individual. I will focus on the exceptions related to citizenship and presence in the United States. Thanks to help from some smart friends, here is how I read the language: Do the individual mandate and penalty tax apply? Uninsured U.S. citizen Uninsured and not a citizen Living in the U.S. Living outside the U.S. Legally in the U.S. Illegally in the U.S. Resident in the U.S. Not resident in the U.S. Resident in the U.S. Not resident in the U.S. House-passed Yes No Yes No Yes No Reid amendment Yes Yes Yes ?? No ?? This table is more complex than I would like, in part because of the different approaches in the two bills. The key is the comparison of the two red cells. Under the Reid amendment, beginning in 2011: If you are a U.S. citizen living in the U.S. and you are uninsured, you pay the penalty tax. If you are illegally in the U.S. and you are uninsured, you do not pay the penalty tax. In 2016 the [...]

Breaking the no middle class tax increase pledge (again)

By |Friday, 20 November 2009|Categories: Uncategorized|Tags: , , |

Here are six tax increases (eight if you split #4 into its three components) that would violate the President's pledge not to raise taxes on families with income less than $250,000.

The 72-hour rule

By |Thursday, 19 November 2009|Categories: Uncategorized|Tags: |

Six weeks ago eight Senate Democrats sent Leader Reid a letter with a "plan for greater transparency." Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-AR) also issued a press release: Citing the right of Arkansans to know in advance [...]

Go to Top